Difference between revisions of "Talk:Device Database"

(Cassetten-Decks vs Kassettendecks)
(Verstärker)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Cassetten-Decks vs Kassettendecks==
+
==Reorganization of the device database==
Darüber, wleche Form die Richtige ist, kann man sich vermutlich trefflich streiten. Der [http://www.duden.de Duden] kennst zumindest sowohl ''Kassettenrekorder'' als auch das ''Kassettendeck'', auch Wikipedia führt den [[wp:Kassettenrekorder|Kassettenrekorder]].
+
So slowly the list here is getting a bit longer, so I thought about whether you should not bring a bit of structure pure and the devices something order. Under [[Device Database/Suggestion]] is a first idea --[[User:Gero|Gero]] 08:12, 26 Jun 2008 (CEST)
  
In der jetzigen Form haben wir auf jeden Fall das Problem, dass wir zwei verschiedene Kategorien für die gleiche Gerätegruppe haben: [[:Kategorie:Cassetten-Decks]] und [[:Kategorie:Kassettendecks]] --[[Benutzer:Gero|Gero]] 09:33, 26. Apr 2008 (CEST)
+
Doesn't look bad, can be done like this. --[[User:Passat|Passat]] 19:01, 26 Jun 2008 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
I just put my foot down and adopted Gero's structure. Furthermore the device database was extended by the sections home cinema, car hifi and TV. Especially the extension by home cinema and TV was necessary in my opinion, because Hifi and TV are merging more and more. See e.g. topic categories of "[http://www.hifi-forum.de Hifi-Forum]". Suggestions and constructive criticism are of course very welcome. Best regards, [[User:Markus|Markus]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Hi Roman, thanks for the additions to the car hifi section. However, I'm not quite sure if it might be a bit too much of a good thing. Keyword: oversystematization.
 +
After all, it's more costly for us to serve or fill so many categories.
 +
Since the car hifi section is still quite fresh, maybe we should start less systematized to see if it is accepted at all, and then systematize more if necessary.  
 +
My - now also optimized for search engines and adapted to your additions - proposal would therefore be:
 +
 
 +
== Car-Hifi ==
 +
=== Car radios ===
 +
* [[Car radios]] (without drive)
 +
* [[CD car radios]]
 +
* [[DVD car radios]]
 +
* [[Cassette car radios]]
 +
* [[minidisc car radios]]
 +
* [[MP3 car radios]]
 +
 
 +
=== Loudspeakers ===
 +
* [[car hi-fi speakers]]
 +
* [[car hifi subwoofer]]
 +
 
 +
=== Amplifiers ===
 +
* [[car hifi power amplifiers]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
What do you think? Gero? Best regards, Markus

Latest revision as of 13:37, 6 April 2010

Reorganization of the device database[edit]

So slowly the list here is getting a bit longer, so I thought about whether you should not bring a bit of structure pure and the devices something order. Under Device Database/Suggestion is a first idea --Gero 08:12, 26 Jun 2008 (CEST)

Doesn't look bad, can be done like this. --Passat 19:01, 26 Jun 2008 (CEST)

I just put my foot down and adopted Gero's structure. Furthermore the device database was extended by the sections home cinema, car hifi and TV. Especially the extension by home cinema and TV was necessary in my opinion, because Hifi and TV are merging more and more. See e.g. topic categories of "Hifi-Forum". Suggestions and constructive criticism are of course very welcome. Best regards, Markus


Hi Roman, thanks for the additions to the car hifi section. However, I'm not quite sure if it might be a bit too much of a good thing. Keyword: oversystematization. After all, it's more costly for us to serve or fill so many categories. Since the car hifi section is still quite fresh, maybe we should start less systematized to see if it is accepted at all, and then systematize more if necessary. My - now also optimized for search engines and adapted to your additions - proposal would therefore be:

Car-Hifi[edit]

Car radios[edit]

Loudspeakers[edit]

Amplifiers[edit]


What do you think? Gero? Best regards, Markus